Thailand-Cambodia Border Conflict 2025: History, Tensions, and the Path Ahead

Thailand and Cambodia—two significant Southeast Asian nations—are historically, culturally, and geographically interconnected. Both are Buddhist-majority countries and share centuries-old civilizational ties. Yet, their relationship has often been marred by territorial disputes. The most persistent and violent among them revolves around the Preah Vihear Temple, a sacred and strategic site located on their shared border. The ongoing clash that erupted again on 24 July 2025 has reignited fears of another prolonged border conflict. This article explores the historical background, international judgments, and the latest developments in the conflict, along with an outlook for the future.

History and Background

In ancient times, present-day Cambodia was part of the powerful Khmer Empire, which constructed the Preah Vihear Temple in the 11th century. For centuries, the temple remained under Khmer (Cambodian) control. However, as borders shifted over time, tensions grew between Thailand (then Siam) and Cambodia.

During French colonial rule in the 19th century, Cambodia became part of French Indochina. In 1907, the French drew a map that placed the temple within Cambodian territory—a move Thailand rejected. This laid the foundation for a prolonged territorial dispute that continues to fuel diplomatic and military tensions today.

International Court of Justice (ICJ) Judgment – 1962

In 1954, both nations turned to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). After deliberation, the ICJ ruled in 1962 that the Preah Vihear Temple belongs to Cambodia. Thailand, however, remained unsatisfied with the verdict, arguing over the ownership of surrounding land. This unresolved aspect became the crux of ongoing confrontations.

UNESCO Listing and Renewed Conflict – 2008 to 2011

In 2008, UNESCO designated the Preah Vihear Temple as a World Heritage Site, leading to massive protests in Thailand. Many Thais saw this move as legitimizing Cambodian claims over the entire disputed area. The result was a military conflict between 2008 and 2011, during which:

• Armed skirmishes occurred frequently.
• Dozens of soldiers died.
• Hundreds of civilians were injured or displaced.

The conflict intensified to such an extent that ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) had to intervene diplomatically.

Second ICJ Petition – 2011 to 2013

In 2011, Cambodia returned to the ICJ, seeking a clarification of the 1962 judgment. The court ruled again in 2013, stating that not only the temple but the surrounding area also belongs to Cambodia, and ordered Thailand to withdraw its troops. Although both nations agreed to respect the judgment, military presence in the border area continued, keeping tensions alive.

Geopolitical and Diplomatic Dimensions

The dispute is not merely territorial—it involves national pride, cultural identity, and regional geopolitics. External powers also play a behind-the-scenes role:

• United States has traditionally leaned toward Thailand, a key strategic ally.
• China supports Cambodia as part of its expanding influence in Southeast Asia.

This complex geopolitical web often obstructs resolution efforts. Nonetheless, bilateral diplomacy and regional mechanisms like ASEAN remain vital.

Current Situation – July 2025 Escalation

On 24 July 2025, the Thailand-Cambodia conflict reignited with unprecedented intensity:

• Both armies exchanged heavy artillery and rocket fire.
• Thailand deployed F-16 fighter jets, targeting Cambodian military outposts.
• Cambodia retaliated using ground artillery and drone strikes.
• As of now, over 15 people have died, and more than 120,000 civilians have been displaced.
• Cambodia has lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations, accusing Thailand of violating the ICJ judgment.
• Diplomatic ties are suspended—ambassadors have been recalled and cross-border trade halted, resulting in millions in daily economic losses.

---

Conclusion

The Thailand-Cambodia border conflict is far more than a fight over land—it represents unresolved historical wounds, national identity, and strategic interests. The Preah Vihear Temple stands as both a symbol of shared heritage and a source of bitter rivalry.

As military escalation risks destabilizing the broader Southeast Asian region, both nations must choose diplomacy over warfare. The active involvement of ASEAN, UN, and other international mediators is now more crucial than ever.

Peaceful dialogue, legal adherence to ICJ rulings, and mutual cultural respect offer the only viable path to long-term resolution.